"Freedom is having nothing left to lose."
"Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose."
"Tan solo seremos libres cuando no haya màs que perder."
All are sentences that one hears or reads everywhere when trying to define freedom. True freedom; freedom of the mind and not that financial or territorial freedom crap. Financial freedom is slavery to money and possessions. Territorial freedom is freedom within borders. Both of which are not true because one has to fight for them or earn them rendering one's freedom attached to another's approval or loss or death, etc.
So we learn that in order to have freedom, one must have nothing. And we go on chasing that notion.
But doesn't having freedom count for having something? It does.
So where does this leave us?
In order to truly be free, one must lose everything, including freedom.